What if your AI assistant could instantly access your entire project documentation—troubleshooting guides, decision logs, API references, and operational procedures—without ever asking you to manually find and attach files?
That's exactly what we achieved by integrating the Context7 MCP (Model Context Protocol) server into our development workflow for EVE Frontier's EF-Map project. The result? Documentation lookup time dropped from 3-5 minutes (with constant user interruption) to 10-15 seconds of fully automated retrieval. Let me show you how we did it and why it matters for AI-assisted development.
The Problem: Manual File Attachment Hell
Working with AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot has transformed how we build EF-Map. But there was one persistent friction point that slowed us down dozens of times per day:
The documentation lookup dance.
Here's what it looked like before Context7:
- AI asks for documentation: "I need the smoke testing procedure. Can you attach AGENTS.md, copilot-instructions.md, and LLM_TROUBLESHOOTING_GUIDE.md?"
- Human hunts through repo: Open file explorer, navigate folders, locate the right files (2-3 minutes of context switching)
- Human manually attaches: Drag files into chat or use attachment UI
- AI reads sequentially: Processes each file, asks clarifying questions
- Back-and-forth continues: 3-4 message exchanges before AI has enough context to proceed
Total time per documentation lookup: 3-5 minutes. Total user interruption: 100%. Number of times this happened per day: 15-20+.
For a project with two active repositories (EF-Map main app and the overlay helper), comprehensive documentation (troubleshooting guides, decision logs, architecture specs, operational procedures), and heavy AI-assisted development, this added up to 45-100 minutes of wasted time daily—time spent not coding, but playing file attachment relay.
Beyond raw time, manual file attachment breaks flow state. Every interruption forces you to context-switch from strategic thinking ("What should this feature do?") to mechanical file hunting ("Where did I put that doc again?"). The cognitive overhead compounds quickly.
The Solution: Context7 MCP Server
Context7 is an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides AI agents with instant access to documentation from GitHub repositories and 500+ external libraries. Think of it as a real-time documentation search engine that your AI assistant can query automatically, without human intermediary.
The key innovation: MCP servers run locally in VS Code and integrate directly with GitHub Copilot Agent mode. When your AI needs documentation, it can invoke Context7 tools to search and retrieve relevant content—all transparently, while you keep coding.
How It Works
Context7 operates through three components:
- VS Code MCP Configuration: A
.vscode/mcp.jsonfile tells VS Code how to launch the Context7 server (vianpxfor zero local installation) - Repository Indexing: You submit your GitHub repos to Context7's web dashboard. Their service crawls your documentation, extracts code snippets, and builds a searchable index.
- Tool Invocation: AI agents use two MCP tools:
resolve-library-id: Find libraries by name (e.g., "ef-map-overlay" →/diabolacal/ef-map-overlay)get-library-docs: Retrieve documentation with optional topic filtering and token limits
For our EVE Frontier map project, we indexed both repositories:
| Repository | Library ID | Code Snippets | Trust Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EF-Map-main | /diabolacal/ef-map |
1,143 | 4.4 |
| ef-map-overlay | /diabolacal/ef-map-overlay |
163 | 4.4 |
| Total | 1,306 |
Configuration Deep Dive
Setting up Context7 required three files and a paid API key ($7/month for private repo indexing). Here's how we structured it:
1. VS Code MCP Configuration
The .vscode/mcp.json file configures the local MCP server:
{
"mcpServers": {
"context7": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@upstash/context7-mcp@latest"],
"env": {
"CONTEXT7_API_KEY": "ctx7sk-..."
}
}
}
}
This tells VS Code: "When GitHub Copilot needs Context7 tools, launch npx @upstash/context7-mcp@latest and pass my API key via environment variable." Zero local installation—npx handles everything on-demand.
2. Repository Configuration (context7.json)
The context7.json file controls what Context7 indexes and includes critical operational rules. Here's an excerpt from our overlay repository config:
{
"name": "EF-Map Overlay Helper",
"description": "Native Windows helper + DirectX 12 overlay for EVE Frontier",
"exclude": [
"build/**",
"CMakeFiles/**",
"*.exe",
"*.dll",
"*.lib"
],
"focus": [
"docs/",
"src/",
".github/copilot-instructions.md",
"AGENTS.md"
],
"rules": [
"CRITICAL: Helper must launch from external PowerShell window (not VS Code terminal) for smoke testing",
"Use process name 'exefile.exe' for injection (not PID - PIDs change every launch)",
"Follow GPT-5 Codex workflow: purposeful preamble, synchronized todo list, delta-style updates"
]
}
These LIBRARY RULES are game-changing. When Context7 retrieves documentation, it includes these operational guardrails at the top of the response. So when an AI queries "show smoke testing procedure for overlay helper," it gets back the PowerShell commands and the CRITICAL requirement to use an external window—knowledge that would otherwise require reading multiple files to discover.
3. Agent Documentation Updates
We updated both repositories' AGENTS.md and .github/copilot-instructions.md files to instruct AI agents how to use Context7. Key guidance included:
- When to use: Any documentation lookup, cross-repo coordination, library API reference
- Query patterns: Add "use context7" to prompts for explicit invocation; otherwise automatic
- Performance expectations: 10-15 seconds vs 3-5 minutes manual attachment
- What it returns: Library rules, code snippets, API docs, cross-references
This integration builds on our earlier work with vibe coding methodology and the Cloudflare optimization workflows we use for EVE Frontier map development.
Real-World Demonstration: Overlay Smoke Testing
Let's see the difference in action. Here's an actual scenario from our development workflow:
Scenario: AI agent needs the smoke testing procedure after making changes to the overlay helper's /inject endpoint.
Before Context7 (Old Workflow)
- AI: "I need the smoke testing documentation. Can you attach AGENTS.md, copilot-instructions.md, and LLM_TROUBLESHOOTING_GUIDE.md from the overlay repo?"
- Human: [Stops coding, opens file explorer, navigates to
ef-map-overlay/, locates three files, drags into chat] (2-3 minutes) - AI: "Reading files... I see references to external PowerShell. Can you also attach the overlay smoke script?"
- Human: [Finds
tools/overlay_smoke.ps1, attaches] (1 minute) - AI: "Got it. Here's the procedure..." (Finally provides answer)
Total time: 3-5 minutes. Message exchanges: 3-4. User interruptions: 100%.
After Context7 (New Workflow)
- Human: "Show me the smoke testing procedure for the overlay helper." (Keeps coding)
- AI thinks: "User needs smoke test docs. I'll query Context7..." (Invisible to human)
- AI executes:
mcp_context7_get-library-docs(/diabolacal/ef-map-overlay, topic="smoke testing procedure")(10-15 seconds) - AI responds immediately: "Here's the complete smoke test procedure:
- CRITICAL: Helper must launch from external PowerShell window
- Build:
cmake --build build --config Release - Launch helper:
Start-Process -FilePath <helper-exe> -PassThru - Inject DLL:
ef-overlay-injector.exe exefile.exe <dll-path> - Verify:
Invoke-WebRequest http://127.0.0.1:38765/api/status
Total time: 10-15 seconds. Message exchanges: 1. User interruptions: 0.
The first time Context7 returned our CRITICAL library rules ("Helper must launch from external PowerShell window") without being asked was genuinely magical. That's institutional knowledge we'd previously encoded across three separate files. Context7 surfaced it automatically in the first query.
Performance Impact
The numbers speak for themselves:
| Metric | Before Context7 | After Context7 | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time per lookup | 3-5 minutes | 10-15 seconds | 12-20x faster |
| Message exchanges | 3-4 | 1 | 75% reduction |
| User effort | High (manual hunting) | Zero (fully automated) | 100% elimination |
| Context switching | Every lookup | Never | Flow state preserved |
Extrapolated across our typical 15-20 documentation lookups per day:
- Time saved per day: 45-100 minutes → 3-5 minutes (90%+ reduction)
- Time saved per week: 5-8 hours → 15-25 minutes
- Context switches eliminated: 15-20 → 0
For a $7/month subscription, that's a return of 5-8 hours of focused development time weekly. The ROI is staggering.
Implementation Lessons
Here's what we learned while integrating Context7 into our EVE Frontier map development workflow:
1. Library Rules Are Your Documentation Superpower
The rules array in context7.json is where institutional knowledge lives. Don't just list files to index—encode your most critical operational guardrails. Our "CRITICAL: Helper must launch from external PowerShell window" rule prevented countless failed smoke tests.
2. Topic-Focused Queries Work Best
Generic queries like "show documentation" return everything. Specific queries like "smoke testing procedure after changes helper launch injection verification" return exactly what you need. Context7's semantic search is good—help it by being precise.
3. Indexing Takes Time (But Only Once)
Initial repository indexing took 15-30 minutes per repo (depending on size). But it's a one-time cost. After that, Context7 auto-refreshes when you push changes. Budget initial setup time accordingly.
4. Trust Score Matters for External Libraries
Context7 indexes 500+ external libraries (Cloudflare APIs, React, TypeScript, Windows API, etc.). Trust Score (1-10) indicates documentation quality. Stick with 7+ for reliable results. Our repos scored 4.4—good enough for internal use, could improve with more structured docs.
5. Cross-Repo Coordination Gets Easier
With two repositories (main app + overlay helper), keeping shared documentation synchronized was a constant pain point. Context7 made it trivial—just query both library IDs in the same prompt. The AI sees the complete picture across repos instantly.
6. MCP Tool Re-Enablement After Reload
One quirk: VS Code requires explicit trust for MCP servers after each window reload. You must check the Context7 tools in the Tools UI (chat input → Tools icon → check get-library-docs and resolve-library-id). Annoying but understandable from a security perspective.
Beyond Documentation: The Bigger Picture
Context7 is just one example of a growing category: Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. These are local services that extend AI agent capabilities beyond chat—file systems, APIs, databases, build tools, you name it.
We already use the Chrome DevTools MCP server for browser testing automation (reduced manual DevTools inspection from hours to minutes). With Context7 added for documentation retrieval, our AI agents can now:
- Navigate to URLs and inspect console/network tabs automatically
- Query project documentation across two repos without user involvement
- Access external library docs (Cloudflare Workers, React, TypeScript) on-demand
- Run terminal commands, execute git operations, manage Docker containers
The result? Our AI assistants are evolving from "helpful chatbots" to "autonomous development teammates." They handle the mechanical (documentation lookups, browser testing, file operations) so humans can focus on the strategic (architecture decisions, user experience, feature design).
That's the promise of EVE Frontier-scale development in 2025: not writing less code, but spending more time on code that matters.
Try It Yourself
Want to integrate Context7 into your own workflow? Here's the quick-start:
- Sign up for Context7: Visit context7.com and create an account ($7/month for private repo indexing)
- Create
.vscode/mcp.json: Configure the Context7 MCP server with your API key - Create
context7.json: Define exclusions, focus areas, and operational rules - Submit your repo: Via Context7 web dashboard (indexing takes 15-30 min)
- Update agent docs: Add Context7 usage guidance to
AGENTS.mdand copilot instructions - Enable tools in VS Code: Tools UI → check Context7 boxes after reload
- Test with a query: Ask your AI assistant to retrieve documentation and watch the magic happen
Full setup instructions are available in our Context7 MCP Setup Guide on GitHub.
Conclusion
Context7 MCP integration represents a fundamental shift in how we develop EVE Frontier map tools: from AI assistants that ask for help to AI agents that help themselves.
The 12-20x speedup in documentation retrieval isn't just about saved seconds—it's about eliminated context switches, preserved flow state, and a development experience where AI agents operate at machine speed while humans think at human scale.
For $7/month and one afternoon of setup, we reclaimed 5-8 hours of focused development time per week. That's not automation—that's liberation.
If you're building with AI assistants and tired of the manual file attachment dance, Context7 is worth every penny. Your future self (and your AI teammate) will thank you.
Want to see Context7 in action? Watch how EF-Map's interactive star map processes route calculations across EVE Frontier's 8,000+ systems—powered by documentation-driven development with tools like Context7.
Related Posts
- Vibe Coding: Building a 124,000-Line Project Without Writing Code - Learn how structured documentation and LLM agents enable non-coders to build production applications like EF-Map
- Cloudflare KV Optimization: 93% Cost Reduction Through Smart Caching - Another workflow optimization story focused on reducing API calls and improving performance
- Performance Optimization: From 8-Second Loads to Sub-Second Rendering - How we use Chrome DevTools MCP and other tools to automate performance testing
- Database Architecture: From Blockchain Events to Queryable Intelligence - The PostgreSQL indexing pipeline that complements our documentation-driven development approach